Histopathological AI Detection Research Paper
Assem Sabry, Token AI Research Team
Token AI Research
HAID is a deep learning AI model that detects breast cancer in histopathology images, helping doctors and labs achieve faster and more accurate diagnoses.
Published: 22 June 2025
HAID: Histopathological AI Detection
Author: Assem Sabry
Affiliation: Token AI Research Labs
License: MIT License
Abstract
Breast cancer remains one of the most prevalent and life-threatening diseases among women worldwide. Early detection through histopathological image analysis is crucial for improving treatment outcomes and survival rates. This paper presents HAID (Histopathological AI Detection) — a deep learning–based system designed to automatically detect breast cancer from histopathological images. The model leverages a fine-tuned EfficientNetB0 architecture to distinguish between normal and cancerous tissue with high consistency. HAID demonstrates how artificial intelligence can augment the efficiency and reliability of diagnostic workflows within hospitals and pathology laboratories.
1. Introduction
Histopathological analysis plays a vital role in cancer diagnosis, yet it remains highly dependent on human expertise and subject to inter-observer variability. The integration of deep learning offers new opportunities to enhance diagnostic precision and reduce turnaround times. The HAID model was developed with the objective of supporting pathologists by providing a reliable, AI-powered second opinion that enhances decision-making and optimizes workflow efficiency in clinical environments.
2. Dataset
Total Images: 250,000+ high-resolution histopathological samples
Classification Type: Binary (Normal vs. Cancer)
Image Resolution: Resized to 150×150 pixels
Source: Private dataset (withheld due to privacy and ethical restrictions)
Data Split: 85% training, 15% validation
All data were anonymized, ensuring compliance with data protection regulations. Representative samples include typical normal tissue and confirmed malignant samples used for supervised learning.
3. Methodology
3.1 Model Architecture
The base of HAID is EfficientNetB0, pre-trained on ImageNet, fine-tuned for binary classification.
Custom layers added on top include:
GlobalAveragePooling2D
BatchNormalization
Dense(256, ReLU) + Dropout(0.5)
BatchNormalization
Dense(128, ReLU)
Dense(1, Sigmoid)
Loss Function: Binary Crossentropy
Optimizer: Adam (Initial LR: 1e-4, Fine-tuning LR: 1e-5)
3.2 Training Configuration
Augmentation Techniques:
- Rotation ±25°
- Width & Height Shifts
- Brightness and Zoom Adjustments
- Horizontal & Vertical Flips
- Shear and Channel Shifts
Epochs: 30 (initial)
Early Stopping & LR Reduction: Enabled
Hardware: AWS SageMaker with NVIDIA Tesla T4 GPU (16GB) and Intel Xeon CPU @ 2.50GHz
4. Evaluation
4.1 Metrics
After training, HAID achieved approximately 80% validation accuracy.
The model shows balanced precision and recall across both classes, with detailed performance as follows:
Class | Precision | Recall | F1-Score
Normal | 78.3% | 80.0% | 79.1%
Cancer | 81.2% | 79.5% | 80.3%
These results indicate that HAID can generalize effectively across diverse histopathological patterns, making it a valuable assistive diagnostic tool.
4.2 Explainability
Grad-CAM (Gradient-weighted Class Activation Mapping) was used to visualize class-discriminative regions within tissue images. Heatmaps generated by Grad-CAM provide transparency into the model's reasoning, enhancing interpretability for medical experts.
5. Implementation
5.1 Usage
Installation:
git clone https://github.com/assemsabry/HAID
cd HAID
python -m venv venv
source venv/bin/activate # Linux/Mac
venv\Scripts\activate # Windows
pip install -r requirements.txt
python main.py
5.2 Files
main.py – Main training and inference script
HAIDmodel.h5 – Saved model
training_history.json – Training metrics
heatmap_output.jpg – Grad-CAM visualization
class0sample.png, class1sample.png – Example input images
assem1.jpg – Developer profile image
Dependencies: TensorFlow 2.16+, Keras, NumPy, Matplotlib, scikit-learn, OpenCV (Python 3.13).
6. Deployment
HAID is designed for deployment as a web-based AI diagnostic service.
Features include:
- Web UI for image upload and instant analysis
- Integrated Grad-CAM visualization for transparency
- Backend compatibility with hospital PACS/LIS systems
- Lightweight and easily deployable infrastructure
This architecture enables healthcare institutions to incorporate AI assistance without significant hardware overhead or specialized IT expertise.
7. Use Cases and Benefits
Primary Use: Hospitals, pathology laboratories, and research institutes
Benefits:
- Reduces diagnosis turnaround time
- Assists doctors with a consistent second opinion
- Enhances diagnostic reliability
- Helps prioritize critical cases for immediate review
- Supports digital pathology and telemedicine frameworks
8. Ethics and Privacy
All data used were anonymized and handled under strict confidentiality agreements. HAID is intended as a decision-support system, not a replacement for clinical judgment. Ethical use requires continuous validation and oversight by certified medical professionals.
9. Conclusion and Future Work
The HAID model demonstrates the potential of deep learning to assist in histopathological cancer detection. While current validation accuracy stands at around 80%, future work will focus on expanding dataset diversity, applying advanced architectures (EfficientNetV2, Vision Transformers), and incorporating multi-class classification for other cancer types.
Further evaluation in real-world clinical settings will also be conducted to assess reliability and generalizability.
References
Tan, M., & Le, Q. (2019). EfficientNet: Rethinking Model Scaling for Convolutional Neural Networks.
Selvaraju, R. R., et al. (2017). Grad-CAM: Visual Explanations from Deep Networks via Gradient-based Localization.
Litjens, G., et al. (2017). A Survey on Deep Learning in Medical Image Analysis.
License
MIT License - This research is open source and available for academic and commercial use.
Model Performance
| Class | Precision | Recall | F1-Score |
|---|---|---|---|
| Normal | 78.3% | 80.0% | 79.1% |
| Cancer | 81.2% | 79.5% | 80.3% |
Overall Accuracy: ~80%
